Why Trump Supporters Avoid Talking About January 6th Insurrection

The January 6th insurrection, a violent and unlawful attack on the United States Capitol, remains a contentious and often overlooked topic by Trump supporters. This article delves into the reasons behind their silence and explores the broader implications of this collective amnesia.

Shame and Denial

Many Trump supporters refrain from discussing the insurrection because they are ashamed of the events that unfolded. Unlike the constitutional and illegal actions of the coup plotters, which inevitably exposed Donald Trump’s incompetence, their silence is a form of denial. They refuse to accept that their leader orchestrated and incited the riot to prevent the peaceful transfer of power to Joe Biden.

Specific DETAILS and Omissible Facts

There are several specific details that Trump supporters wish to avoid discussing:

Ray Epps and the Doors: The identity of the individual who opened the doors to the Capitol, and whether they were directed to do so by outside actors. Ashli Babbitt’s Death and Motives: Details surrounding the fatal shooting of Ashli Babbitt, an innocent Capitol Police officer, and the motivations behind the attack. Pipe Bombs and Informants: The presence and roles of informants connected to the insurrection, and the role of pipe bombs in the incident.

The Demise of Democratic Accountability

Contrary to the claim that Democrats do not want to discuss the riot, it is conservatives who prefer to avoid the topic. By failing to address the insurrection, Democrats are not only acknowledging the facts but also maintaining accountability. Republicans, on the other hand, have a vested interest in downplaying the event. This allows them to retain a semblance of legitimacy in the eyes of their base and deflect responsibility onto outside actors or false narratives.

Conservative Hawkishness and Extremism

The term 'conservative' has been co-opted by the far-right, leading to a coalition of extremists who are clearly responsible for the January 6th events. Many Republicans now align with these extremists, unable to condemn the violence against the democratic process.

Following the setback at the Capitol, there was initial condemnation of the attack from some conservatives, but as the shock subsided, the narrative shifted. Pundits on right-wing media began promoting conspiracy theories about left-wing provocation, which provided a convenient cover for many conservatives to avoid accountability.

Implications of Silent Complicity

The insurrection was no ordinary act of violence. It was a direct attack on the United States Capitol and the democratic process, orchestrated by Trump and his supporters. Their silencing of the events is a form of whitewashing history, aimed at avoiding the label of being "anti-American" and preserving political power through extremism.

The failure to hold accountable those responsible for the attack fosters a dangerous precedent. If historical events like the January 6th insurrection are downplayed, the risk of a repeat performance grows. The analogy with the Holocaust is relevant: denying the historical events and their ramifications paves the way for their recurrence.

For Trump supporters, avoiding discussion of the January 6th insurrection is a strategy to protect their political future. It is an attempt to normalize extremist acts, which they can use to gain political ground by undermining the legitimacy of their opposition.

By understanding the motivations behind this silence, we can recognize the importance of holding those accountable for their actions. The truth must be acknowledged, and history must be accurately recorded to prevent the repetition of such events.