Why Senators Object to Merrick Garland's Appointment as Attorney General

One of the main reasons senators might object to Merrick Garland being appointed Attorney General could be rooted in concerns about his judicial record, particularly his reputation for being an apolitical judge. This reputation means he is less likely to overlook political considerations when making legal decisions, which some may perceive as a threat.

Républican Objections and Political Concerns

It is important to understand that Republican senators may oppose Garland's appointment not only because of his judicial approach but also due to political reasons. There are two primary scenarios to consider. Firstly, GOP senators might oppose his appointment because they believe he lacks the necessary respect for the Constitution and, by extension, fundamental American rights such as the Second Amendment.

The Second Amendment and the broader Bill of Rights are enshrined in the Constitution, and these provisions form the bedrock of many Americans' understanding of their rights. Therefore, Senate opposition could stem from a belief that Garland would not defend the Second Amendment or other provisions of the Constitution with the same zeal as other more ideologically aligned judges.

Historical Precedents and Future Implications

Another key point of contention for Republicans is Garland's expertise in prosecuting right-wing extremists. As a respected figure with a history in this specialized area, he might be seen as a threat to those who sought to suppress information on Right Wing Extremism in the past. In 2009, Republicans fiercely opposed a DHS report that highlighted the threat of right-wing extremism, and they are unlikely to want to see the man who could potentially prosecute those individuals confirmed as Attorney General.

Political Motivations and Legends

Politicians, regardless of party, often act with primary considerations of re-election on their minds. This is a fundamental principle of political behavior, and it’s crucial to consider this angle when examining the motivations behind political actions. Senators might object to Garland's appointment simply because it’s an opportunity to continue giving President Biden a difficult time. Some might see it as a form of "karma" if they believe he holds grudges against Republicans, as they perceive him to have a more stringent approach to prosecuting political wrongdoing.

Partisan Retaliation and Integrity

Some Republican leaders may also oppose Garland's appointment out of a general animosity towards the president and his appointments. They might be motivated by a desire to punish President Biden for political reasons, rather than genuine concerns about Garland's qualifications or integrity. This kind of partisan retaliation can be seen in actions like those taken by Senators such as Hawley, who might not give Garland an easy pass simply because he is a Democratic appointee.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the opposition to Merrick Garland's appointment as Attorney General is multifaceted and likely driven by a combination of his judicial reputation, political motivations, and historical actions. It is incumbent upon Democrats and others to be vigilant and vocal in addressing these concerns, ensuring that the highest standards of integrity and objectivity are maintained in the justice system.