Why Refused Return of Migrant Refugees by Certain Countries in the EU?

Some countries within the European Union (EU) have faced a significant challenge in accepting back refugee migrants that have been deported by other EU nations. This refusal can be attributed to several complex factors, including the political will of governments, historical precedence, demographic trends, and bureaucratic inefficiencies. This article delves into the reasons behind these actions and their repercussions.

Political Will and Public Perception

One of the primary reasons for the refusal to accept back migrant refugees is the lack of political will among certain EU governments. These governments prioritize public perception and the maintenance of a positive image over the practical wellbeing of their citizens. The fear of being labeled as racist or xenophobic can often override rational policies aimed at protecting public safety.

Historical Precedence and Crime Rates

Another significant factor is the historical precedent and crime rates following the influx of migrants. Many authorities have noted a rise in crime statistics, which has led them to question the merits of accepting these individuals back. For instance, European crime data shows an uptick in incidents involving migrants. Although efforts are made to hide these statistics, they still reveal a concerning trend.

Germany's Precedent and Immigration History

Germany, in particular, has a history of accepting immigrants, with very few cases leading to deportation. This trend has set a precedent: if an immigrant is sent back, it is often due to their criminal activities. As a result, many nations have learned that accepting back an immigrant without a legitimate reason often means accepting a notorious criminal. Given this fact, no sane nation would wish to receive such individuals.

Demographic Considerations

The demographic makeup of migrants further complicates the situation. Most immigrants are young men, which poses a challenge for unstable nations with a large male population. The presence of young men has been linked to political instability and crime in some regions.

Country-Specific Challenges

Tunisia, Morocco, and Egypt
In these countries, there is a strict policy of not accepting deported illegal immigrants. They argue that illegal immigrants are not refugees, but people seeking better economic prospects. This policy is complicated by the challenge of verifying nationality, given the widespread use of Arabic dialects. The process of determining nationality and issuing a 'one-way passport' can take several weeks, during which time the immigrant may have already left for another EU country.

Algeria
The Algerian government faces significant corruption, which they use to justify their failures. As a result, they deliberately prolong the deportation process, making it nearly impossible for EU countries to repatriate migrants effectively.

Libya
In some cases, the issue is geopolitical rather than administrative. Libya is currently in a state of war, making it challenging to facilitate safe deportations.

Conclusion

The issues surrounding the acceptance of refugee migrants following deportation by EU countries are multifaceted and require a nuanced approach. While maintaining positive public perception is important, so is ensuring the safety and security of citizens. Governments must balance these priorities carefully and consider the broader implications of their policies.

By addressing these challenges, EU countries can work towards a more cohesive and effective immigration policy that ensures both public safety and the humane treatment of migrants.