Why Do Gun Opponents Call for Gun Support in Times of Need?
When you hear gun opponents crises a quarter of a mile away, they often scream for help from someone with a gun. Yet, some might suggest there's more to this than just hypocrisy. Hear me out.
The Nexus Between Gun Opponents and Work Ethic
Gun opponents in the United States often label themselves as liberals. These individuals have a deep aversion to work, self-discipline, and personal responsibility. It's not hard to deduce why they might despise someone who takes the necessary steps to secure their safety and their family's. For these individuals, everyday tasks and taking charge of one's life seem like insurmountable challenges.
Moreover, there's another angle: what about those who produce their own food, like hunters? It's clear that they can't stand the idea of people hunting for food. In their eyes, it's a graphic reminder of the need for self-sufficiency and responsibility.
Giving into Convenience: The Use of Third-Party Services
One common instance is when these individuals find themselves in a situation where a firearm might be necessary. Instead of engaging with the reality of owning and using a firearm, they opt to purchase guns with their tax money and entrust third-party companies to manage them. This approach allows them to distance themselves from the responsibility, making it less likely that the company they hire will be associated directly with the company or organization they represent.
For example, when a group that does not support firearms faces a security threat, they hire an armed security firm. In case something goes wrong, they can shift the blame to the third-party company. This is a clear display of their cowardice and reluctance to take on the challenge of personal responsibility.
The Underlying Character Flaws
From a survival standpoint, individuals with such character flaws would not survive in the wild. Nature wouldn't tolerate them. The law of the jungle dictates that only the fittest can survive. Those who demand more laws to protect them but do nothing to defend their own family can be seen as cowards. It is hypocritical to call for someone to protect them while simultaneously opposing the very means by which others can protect themselves.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the gun opponents' actions in times of need reveal a deeper issue. It's not just about hypocrisy; it's about a fundamental lack of personal responsibility and discipline. Understanding these underlying issues might help in finding more effective solutions to address the broader concerns related to firearm use and safety. While the debate around gun control remains intense, it's important to recognize the human elements that fuel such discussions.