Why Bugging Out Isn't Always the Smart Choice During a Pandemic

The debate over whether to bug out or bivy in during a pandemic often polarizes opinions. While some proponents of preparedness advocate for retreating to the wilderness to avoid infection, the reality is that staying at home is typically the safer and more practical option.

Perceived Benefits of Bugging Out

It is sometimes suggested that during a pandemic, individuals should retreat to the wilderness to avoid the threat of infection. However, this mindset can be overly simplistic and based on pure fantasy.

The notion that one should leave their home and head to the woods, stocking up only on essential supplies that can be carried on their back, is fraught with numerous logistical challenges. Such a situation would need to be so widespread and extreme that local infrastructure and basic supplies are completely unavailable, yet the wilderness remains unaffected, which is highly improbable.

The Risks and Challenges of Bugging Out

Theoretically, bugging out may seem like a viable option in a truly worst-case scenario where one's home is rendered uninhabitable. Practicing 'bugging out at home' or camping can be a useful way to gauge one's preparedness, but in reality, doing so might not be the most practical or intelligent choice.

Firstly, travelers in the wilderness would have no guarantee of internet access, making it difficult to monitor the evolving situation and receive critical information. Additionally, the environment in the wilderness requires that one be physically fit and well-prepared. The physical demands of such a journey cannot be underestimated, especially for older individuals or those with physical limitations.

Practicality and Safety of Remaining at Home

For the majority of people, staying at home is a safer and more practical option. Modern technology allows us to work from home, attend virtual meetings, and maintain social connections through various digital mediums. Essential supplies and resources can be stored within the home, making it a more secure environment during a pandemic.

Moreover, those with pre-existing conditions or weaker immune systems may find it challenging to navigate the wilderness safely. For example, the extended family mentioned earlier is practicing 'bugging out at home' and has plenty of food and activities to keep them engaged.

Conclusion

While bugging out can be a thought exercise in worst-case scenarios, it is not a practical or realistic strategy for most people. Preppers should focus on being well-prepared for home-based scenarios, ensuring they have the necessary supplies and systems in place.

Ultimately, preparedness requires a balanced approach that considers the practicality and safety of staying at home, while also being prepared for more extreme situations if necessary. By understanding the risks and challenges of bugging out, individuals and families can make informed decisions that prioritize their safety and security during a pandemic.