Who Ultimately Won the Presidential Debate: Harris or Trump?
As the dust settles on the 2020 presidential debates, it's worth examining who emerged as the victor: Kamala Harris or Donald Trump? While many viewers felt that Trump could not rein in his delusions, others argued that Harris, with a little support, outmaneuvered her opponent effectively.
A Comparison of Kamala Harris and Donald Trump's Approaches
During the debates, Kamala Harris often found herself in a position of strength, leveraging her experience and clarity. However, similar to her debate performances, she sometimes had to rely on a support network to maintain a lead. On the other hand, Donald Trump, with his unfiltered statements and constant attacks, ultimately showcased his impatience and inability to control himself, resulting in numerous blunders.
The Role of Debate Moderators
Rather than focusing solely on the candidates, the debate moderators played a significant role. Their partisan stance and support for Harris led many to question the fairness of the debates. Here are a few striking examples:
Questioning the Economy
The first question posed to Kamala Harris was straightforward: "Do you believe Americans are better off now than they were four years ago?" To which Harris began by redirecting blame to Donald Trump while simultaneously acknowledging that the economy is in a poor state. This confusing response invited criticism from those who felt Harris was dodging a critical issue.
The Partisan Questions and Fact-Checking
The debate moderators often posed leading questions that already leaned towards Harris. For instance, they might ask, "President Trump, why do you suck on issue X?" followed by, "VP Harris, why does Trump suck on issue X, and how will your policies improve the situation?" This format not only biased the debate but frequently ignored Trump's factual arguments, instead engaging in ad hominem attacks and fact-checking. Even when Harris lied or miscalculated, the moderators did not intervene, leaving her arguments largely unchallenged.
The Margins of Victory
Observing the overall performance, it appears that Harris may have won the debate, albeit with some assistance from the debate format and her support team. However, her recent record of deception and lack of clear answers raises questions about the reliability of her promises. Her constant references to Donald Trump without addressing solutions has been criticized as a fundamental flaw in her campaign.
While many liberal factions heralded Harris as a winner, her house of cards may be more fragile than meets the eye. The debate highlights the complexity of the election and the challenges both candidates face in delivering a coherent message to the electorate.
Conclusion
Despite the debate's nuances, it is evident that Kamala Harris emerged as the victor, but with a win that may be challenging to sustain through the remainder of the election cycle. The question remains: will her supporters trust her to deliver on her promises, or will they lose faith given the inconsistencies in her previous engagements?
Stay tuned for future debates and the ongoing race to the White House in 2024.