The Arizona Election Integrity Law: Safeguarding Against Voter ID Theft
The recent debate over voter ID in Arizona highlights the ongoing challenges of ensuring secure and fair elections. In their so-called election integrity law, Arizona Republicans are demanding sensitive voter information that could fall into the hands of ID thieves. This breach of trust not only undermines public confidence but also threatens the integrity of the electoral process.
PA's Absentee Ballot Scheme and Its Flaws
PA (the exact state abbreviation is not clear, but it refers to Pennsylvania) sent all voters absentee ballots, which suggests a well-intentioned but ultimately flawed approach. Anytime you change the voting laws, it must be approved by a statewide election commission, a requirement that was not met. This oversight leaves room for vulnerability, as any new laws must go through rigorous scrutiny and approval processes.
Identity Verification and Its Pitfalls
The Arizona law requires voters to provide their last four digits and their date of birth (DOB). These details are then compared to the voting list to verify identities. However, the effectiveness of such a system is highly questionable. Election officials have found that the majority of names on the rolls do not match any viable voter.
The Challenge for Election Officials
Electoral officials must balance the need for security with the practical challenges of running an election. While they can spot clearly fraudulent identities by eye, digital systems cannot identify this type of manipulation. For example, an automated computer system can easily misinterpret personal data as voter records. Let's consider this:
Qaaaa
You can look at this and realize very quickly that this is not a person. The difference between a realistic and a fake name is often subtle. Yet, human eyes can easily spot discrepancies. However, computers cannot make these distinctions as effectively.
Security and Hacking Concerns
During the 2019 and 2020 Defcon events, voting machines were purchased off platforms like eBay and Craigslist. These machines, which were sold with known flaws, were shown to be easily hackable. The problem is not just about duplicate voting, as only a few individuals were caught in 2020. The real issue lies in the need for voter ID to serve as a frustration check. However, computers and hackers do not care about ID verification.
The Big Picture: Election Security
One of the biggest issues in the 2016 election was the lack of a paper trail. Three states had called for a recount, but Pennsylvania, which largely relies on machines, could not conduct one due to the lack of a paper trail. The 2020 election saw improvements thanks to Chris Krebs, who ensured a secure and transparent process. However, we are still at basic security measures.
Verifiable Chain of Custody
Verifiable chain of custody is crucial to maintaining trust in the electoral process. This step ensures that every ballot has a record of who handled it and when. While this is an improvement, it is far from a complete solution. Arizona nearly handed over its election infrastructure to an amateur auditor, which could expose the system to further vulnerabilities.
Conclusion: Stressing the Importance of Personal Data Security
Your personal data is the key that computers use to pretend to be you. When you provide this information, you put yourself at risk of becoming a target for ID thieves. It is imperative that we enhance security measures to protect this sensitive information and ensure a fair and transparent democratic process.
As we move forward, it is vital to address the root causes of election security issues and implement robust safeguards to prevent ID theft and other forms of electoral manipulation. The future of our democracy depends on it.