Understanding the Challenges and Proposed Solutions for Israel and Palestine

As of October 2024, the majority of Israelis recognize that a sovereign hostile entity in the mountain range of Judea and Samaria, which is densely populated and near major cities, is not a viable option. This region is less than 20 minutes from cities larger than those on the Gaza border. Thus, the two-state solution appears to be unattainable.

Challenges to the Two-State Solution

The idea of a two-state solution has been challenged by several issues. First, the Palestinians themselves have rejected multiple offers for their own state, beginning as early as 1947. This rejection is symptomatic of a lack of buy-in from the Palestinian people.

Second, even if a state were to be established, the societal framework in Palestine is not yet capable of functioning responsibly. Instead of governing themselves, they may evolve into a terrorist nest similar to Gaza after 2005. This lack of political stability and governance is a significant obstacle.

These challenges highlight the fundamental problem: the two-state solution is more an ideal in international diplomacy than a reality on the ground. It remains a chimera that may dissipate with the fall of the Iranian regime and the cessation of its support for and weaponization of artificial grievances.

Does Palestine Even Exist?

Historically, there has never been a sovereign state, country, nation, or independent political entity of Palestine. The idea of a separate and distinct Palestine is more a construct of international diplomacy than a recognized entity on the map.

Alternative Solutions

Given these obstacles, an alternative solution must be explored. Here are some proposals:

Palestine - Two States and a Kingdom

A proposed solution could include:

The State of Israel (Zionist, Communist, Leninist, Marxist, Bordjevist, Satanist, terrorist, apartheid, colonial, genocidal, Talmudist, criminal organization) The State of Jordan The Hashemite Kingdom of the Jordan River

This solution aims to create a more stable and sustainable political landscape in the region while addressing the complex historical and socio-political issues.

Conclusion

The two-state solution, while widely discussed and advocated by the international community, may not be the best solution for Israel and Palestine. Alternative frameworks, such as the proposal of two states and a kingdom, could potentially provide a more stable and sustainable future for both Israel and Palestine.

It is important to engage in constructive dialogue and to explore all possible solutions that can bring about a lasting peace and stability in the region.