Understanding Accessory After the Fact Charges in Hiding Fugitives
When someone is charged with a crime after it occurred, and another party helps them evade capture, they may be charged as an accessory after the fact to the original crime. However, in many situations, the charges may be more accurately categorized as obstruction of justice rather than accessory after the fact. This article explores the nuances of these charges and provides clarity on the legal distinctions.
Defining Accessory After the Fact
Accessory after the fact refers to a scenario where an individual provides assistance to a fugitive with the knowledge that the fugitive has committed a crime. This form of assistance is illegal and can result in criminal charges. However, proving this knowledge in court can be challenging.
For example, if your friend is arrested for murder and you help them get rid of evidence, you could be charged as an accessory after the fact. The knowledge of the crime must be established for such charges to be valid.
Charges of Obstruction of Justice
Obstruction of justice, on the other hand, involves any action that hinders or delays the course of justice, whether or not the person knows the exact nature of the crime. This can include helping a person evade arrest, cover up evidence, or otherwise interfere with law enforcement.
For instance, if your friend shows up at your door seeking a ride to a bus station and you provide the transportation, you are still obstruction of justice, even if you did not know they were a fugitive. The mere act of helping them evade capture can be enough to bring charges.
In the UK, there is a specific offense known as 'assisting an offender.' This offense can apply even if the assistance is provided long after the original crime occurred, such as months or even years later. The key factor is providing active assistance with knowledge of the offender's status.
Legal Criteria for Accessory After the Fact
To determine if someone can be charged as an accessory after the fact, several criteria must be met:
Knowledge of the Crime: The individual must have substantial knowledge that the fugitive has committed a crime. This knowledge can be implied from the circumstances, but direct evidence is preferable.
Active Assistance: The assistance must be active, not passive. Simply providing refuge or transportation can qualify, depending on the context.
Status of the Fugitive: The individual must know that the person they are helping is a fugitive, either in hiding or simply avoiding capture.
Here are some examples to illustrate these criteria:
If you knowingly buried the gun your buddy used to commit a crime in your backyard, you could be charged as an accessory after the fact because you had knowledge of the crime and actively assisted in concealing evidence.
If your friend gives you a knife as a gift without telling you he used it to commit a crime, and you do not know about the crime, you are not an accessory because you did not know the knife was involved in an illegal act.
If your friend asks for a ride to a bus station to evade the police and you provide it, you can still be charged with obstruction of justice, regardless of your knowledge of the crime.
Conclusion and Important Note
The distinction between accessory after the fact and obstruction of justice lies in the intent and knowledge of the individual providing assistance. While accessory after the fact requires knowledge of the crime, obstruction of justice can apply even if the perpetrator of the original crime is unknown or ambiguous.
It is crucial to understand that engaging in such actions can carry severe legal consequences. If you are involved in any situation that resembles these scenarios, it is highly advisable to seek legal advice to protect your rights and interests.
This article is intended to provide information and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Always consult with a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for legal guidance.
Disclaimer: This response is provided for informational purposes only and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Quora users who provide responses to legal questions are intended third-party beneficiaries with certain rights under Quora's Terms of Service.