The Truth About 2020 BLM Protests: Peaceful Protests vs. Devastating Riots

The debate surrounding the 2020 BLM protests and the aftermath has become a contentious issue, with many questioning the peaceful nature of these demonstrations. Claims from insurance companies and other sources regarding the immensity of damage caused during some protests have led to a polarized discussion. However, a closer look at the data and firsthand accounts reveals a different narrative.

Peaceful Protests Prevailed

One of the most critical arguments against the idea of these protests being peaceful is based on the financial implications for insurance companies. It is true that the damage cost billions of dollars, but what is often overlooked is the proportion of this damage that was caused by outside agitators and not the protesters themselves. A study conducted by researchers who tracked the protests found that a vast majority of the events were indeed peaceful, with only 5% of the incidents leading to the described chaos and destruction.

Insurance Claims and Legal Actions

The insurance companies that cover the damage often deny claims or delay payouts, which fuels the narrative of a city being destroyed. However, this does not make the events any less peaceful. The point is that these insurance companies are in the business of denying claims and denying payouts. If the insurance companies were truly concerned with the well-being of the city, they would focus on providing fair and timely compensation rather than denying claims.

Racist and Asinine Labeling of Protests as Riots

Another significant issue is the use of the term "riots" to describe these events. The term "riots" carries a strong connotation of violence and lawlessness, which is not supported by the majority of the accounts and data available. The protests, organized by Black Lives Matter, were aimed at peaceful demonstrations against police brutality, particularly the murder of George Floyd. These protesters were largely peace-loving individuals who participated in marches and rallies, in many cases as a form of constitutional right.

Firsthand Accounts from Participants

Nonetheless, it is crucial to consider firsthand accounts from participants. Many, like the author of this article, marched in BLM protests and can attest to their peaceful nature. For instance, in San Ramon, CA, and other locations, the marches were solemn and solemnized acts of condolences and peaceful intentions. Videos on YouTube and other social media platforms provide ample evidence of the peaceful nature of these marches.

Aftermath and Agitators

It is also essential to recognize that the rioting and destruction observed in some areas are the result of outside agitators and not the legitimate protesters. The actual violence and property destruction were not instigated by BLM members but rather by individuals who sought to disrupt the peaceful nature of these events. Local law enforcement and national security agencies have taken these accounts into consideration.

Conclusion: Balancing Sides and Justice

The discussion around the 2020 BLM protests has highlighted the need for balance and critical thinking. While the damage inflicted on cities was significant, it is crucial to acknowledge the peaceful nature of most of these protests and the external influence that deviated from the intended message of peace and justice.

In conclusion, the 2020 BLM protests were predominantly peaceful, with only a small percentage of incidents resulting in destructive riots. The focus should be on understanding the underlying causes of these events and addressing the issues of systemic racism, police brutality, and social injustice, rather than focusing on the aftermath's financial and emotional toll.

Let's strive for a constructive conversation that promotes understanding and brings about actual change.