The Role of Logic in Shaping Society: A Case Study in Consequentialism
Can logic be used to disprove religion and prove science? The question itself may be a misdirection, as the real question is which framework is more useful and beneficial for society. In this essay, we will explore a hypothetical scenario involving the religion of Consequentialism, and examine the potential societal impact of their application of logic to a practical issue.
Science often claims a unique domain as its turf, suggesting no competition. However, a practical example can reveal the potential for religion to positively influence society, prompting us to consider the comparative utility of different belief systems.
Setting the Stage: The Exhibition of 1854
Let us consider a hypothetical world where a religion known as 'Consequentialism' has been around for a while. This religion is primarily concerned with the consequences of actions and decisions. As the year 1854 approaches, a significant event draws the attention of the Consequentialists: Elisha Otis's groundbreaking 'death defying demonstration' of a safety brake for elevators.
The context is the Exhibition of the Industry of All Nations in New York City. Otis's revolutionary safety brake was an unprecedented technological advancement that promised to enhance safety in tall buildings. However, it also sparked a series of logical considerations among the Consequentialists.
The Logical Dilemma: Banning Elevators for the Greater Good
The Consequentialists sat around pondering the consequences of Otis's invention. Their intra-group joke, "Truth and Consequences," encapsulated their approach to decision-making. After careful analysis, they denounced elevators, asserting that they were mostly evil and should be banned.
Thus, they issued a statement: "Our god has informed us that elevators are mostly evil. It is incumbent upon us to prevent the adoption, investment in, and use of elevators. While height doesn’t matter, no elevators are essential for societal progress." This decision could have far-reaching consequences if adopted by the wider society.
Consequences of the Elevator Ban
Ignoring the implausibility of a small and weak minority significantly impacting global commerce, let us explore the potential outcomes if the Consequentialists' logic prevailed.
Limitation of Vertical Development
The ban on elevators would severely limit vertical development, stunting city growth. Buildings would be limited to structures that do not require significant vertical transportation, significantly impinging on the efficiency and functionality of urban spaces. This limitation could revert societies to less organized and expansive structures.
Impact on Infrastructure and Urban Design
Without elevators, urban design would need to adapt. Staircases would become the primary method of moving between floors, requiring more space allocation and design for ramps. This adjustment would necessitate a re-evaluation of architectural principles, potentially leading to less efficient and less accessible urban environments.
Economic and Social Changes
The prohibition of elevators could have significant economic ramifications. While the safety aspect of elevators could potentially reduce accidents, the loss of efficiency in vertical transportation could slow economic productivity. Additionally, accessibility issues might exacerbate social disparities, as taller buildings and multi-story facilities become more challenging to navigate for individuals with disabilities or those who cannot climb stairs.
Logic as a Tool, Not a Truth Machine
Logic, although a powerful tool, is not a magical truth machine. It is merely a set of rules for reasoning that can be applied to both religious and scientific frameworks. Justifying personal prejudice through logic is not a valid use of this tool. Instead, logic should be used to promote real-world solutions and improve societal outcomes.
Both religion and science utilize logic to guide their thought processes. While science aims to construct, evaluate, and revise theories, religion can use logic to explore the consequences of its beliefs and actions. The utility of logic lies in its ability to ensure valid reasoning and to help societies make informed decisions.
In essence, logic is a method for evaluating the practical impact of beliefs and actions. While it cannot prove or disprove religion or science, it can guide us in determining which framework is more beneficial for societal progress.
Keywords: logic, religion, science, consequentialism, elevator ban