The 'Prince' and the Myth of Financial Independence
When Harry and Meghan decide to break away from the Royal Family and find financial independence, their actions have been accompanied by a mix of scrutiny and ridicule. However, diving into their financial claims and the reality behind their perceived entitlement, one cannot help but question the underlying motives and the extent of their independence.
The Royal Context
Harry and Meghan, often referred to as the Duchess of Sussex, have always been beneficiaries of the Royal Family's resources. From the private jets to the monetary support, they have capitalised on their titles and positions to lead comfortable lives. Now, they claim to want to strive for financial independence, yet their actions somewhat contradict their claims.
Entitlement vs. Reality
It is often said that Harry's recent trip to Sandringham, a historic royal estate, was not just a visit but could be seen as a personal perk. He uses such trips to sprinkle his royal entitlements into the public domain, behaving as if he is the second coming to the future heir to the throne.
Meanwhile, doubts persist over the alleged financial independence of Meghan. Allegedly, her jewelry collection, including blood diamonds, and the reportedly significant funds inherited from Princess Diana, hint at retained financial security. This raises questions about the authenticity of their desire for independence.
Financial Independence Revisited
Let's take a step back and consider the history of financial independence within a royal context. In times past, those who protected their monarchs were rewarded with gold, lands, and titles. This stark contrast to the current era, where individuals still hold onto royal titles and the concomitant benefits, yet claim financial independence.
Their actions remind us of the reality of their financial situation. For instance, Meghan was reportedly spotted wearing extravagant jewelry, while Harry has continued to use the Royal Family's resources for personal gains, such as selling stories and appearances.
Are they truly pursuing financial independence, or are they simply trying to manage their public image while enjoying the comforts of their royal status? The answer seems to have more to do with image and control than genuine financial autonomy.
Concluding Thoughts
The desire for financial independence is a serious matter, especially when compared to the circumstances of those who have struggled to make ends meet. The actions of Harry and Meghan, while perhaps understandable in their quest for a new life, seem more like a continuation of their royal lifestyle, albeit with a different narrative.
Judging from the past, it appears that the expectations and privileges of their position are difficult to relinquish. True financial independence requires more than just a change in narrative; it requires a change in the underlying reality of their financial and social status.
Perhaps the world would become a kinder place if we revisit the principles of respecting one's parents and family, learning from history, and evaluating the true intention behind actions of those who claim to be striving for a new future.