The Oscars and Quality Filmmaking: A Critical Analysis of 'Dances With Wolves'

The Academy Awards, often referred to as the Oscars, are one of the most prestigious awards in the film industry. However, when it comes to judging the quality of a film, does the Oscar ceremony truly reflect the merits of the work? This article delves into a critical analysis of the 1990 film 'Dances With Wolves' and how it fared in the eyes of the academy.

Introduction to the Oscar Controversy

The 1990s saw a significant shift in the dynamics of the film industry, driven by political and social movements. 'Dances With Wolves,' directed and starring Kevin Costner, is a prime example of a film that won multiple Oscars, but its narrative and historical accuracy have been heavily scrutinized. The film's success led to discussions about whether the Oscars truly reflect the quality of filmmaking.

Historical Inaccuracies in 'Dances With Wolves'

Michael Blake, the writer and director, faced criticism for his historical inaccuracies. The film's storyline, set during the American Civil War, deviates significantly from historical facts. A key mistake involves the presence of a Lieutenant General in the Union Army who wasn't actually in command until the following year. The film also overlooks the true nature of the war, suggesting unnecessary human sacrifices and mythical characters that don't align with historical realities.

Character Flaws and Plot Devices

Kevin Costner's portrayal of Lt. Dunbar, the film's protagonist, is criticized for its loose characterization. Dunbar's journey to Fort Hays and his actions there are filled with improbabilities. For instance, his character has a nonsensical explanation for amputating his foot to avoid combat, which is historically inaccurate and illogical. The film's progression, marked by the introduction of a "dancing wolf," is also seen as a convenient plot device rather than a realistic narrative element.

The Impact of Historical Inaccuracies on the Film

The film's narrative, while romanticized and picturesque, fails to provide a realistic portrayal of the American Civil War. The cavalry outpost described in the film, Fort Hays, is inaccurately represented. The description of soldiers engaged in activities like card games and shooting craps rather than combat training is inconsistent with historical evidence. Similarly, the depiction of the Native Americans as honorable and brave is an oversimplification that can be seen as a misrepresentation of the complex historical context.

Conclusion and Reflection

Despite winning multiple Oscars, 'Dances With Wolves' raises questions about the impact of storytelling on historical accuracy and film quality. The recognition by the Oscars might have more to do with the emotional and thematic connections the film evokes rather than its adherence to historical facts. This article argues for a more nuanced approach to judging film quality, emphasizing the importance of historical accuracy, character development, and faithful representation of events.

Overall, while 'Dances With Wolves' remains a culturally significant film, its historical inaccuracies highlight the need for filmmakers to prioritize factual accuracy in their narratives. The Oscars, while a celebration of cinematic achievement, must also critically evaluate the films they honor to ensure they reflect a balanced and honest portrayal of history and quality filmmaking.