The Mormons Strength and Paranoia Before and After the Mountain Meadows Massacre

Introduction

The early and mid-1850s were periods of great anxiety and conflict for the members of the LDS Church (now known as the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints). Faced with potential invasion by the U.S. Army and the violent persecution from anti-Mormons, the community experienced heightened paranoia and tension within the Mountain Meadows area.

Background and Tensions

During the Utah War, which spanned from 1857 to 1858, there was a significant buildup of U.S. forces in anticipation of the invasion of Utah. Rumors of impending attacks and the fear of non-Mormons filling the minds of the general populace led to a climate of paranoia. The members of the LDS Church faced severe violence and persecution, which further strained their resolve. Reports of atrocities committed by their enemies only heightened the group's defensive stance.

The Mountain Meadows Massacre and Its Aftermath

The Mountain Meadows Massacre, which took place in 1857, was one of the most significant and tragic events in LDS history. The massacre saw the LDS members ambushing and massacring a wagon train of immigrants. Many LDS members participated in or were aware of the killings, and the aftermath was shrouded in controversy and lies. Brigham Young, the leader of the LDS Church, is a central figure in much of this discussion.

Young's role in the massacre has been a subject of much debate. The LDS propaganda machine often downplays his involvement, but historians and students of actual history have uncovered evidence suggesting that Young knew about the massacre and even accepted items taken from the victims. Some sources indicate that the LDS Church leader lied about his knowledge of the event to protect himself and his followers.

Brigham Young's Leadership and Paranoia

Brigham Young, the 2nd president of the LDS Church, is often described as a bully who manipulated his followers. Young created an environment of fear and control through the concept of "us versus them." His leadership style fostered dependence and isolation, leaving members vulnerable to his control. Reports suggest that Young tightly managed the resources and information, ensuring that his followers remained barefoot and pregnant while cutting them off from normal society.

This control manifested through various means, including the distribution of scarce resources and the dissemination of false narratives. The church's anti-Mormon stance and fear of perceived threats led to a heightened sense of paranoia. Young's leadership contributed to this environment, and his policies often prioritized the survival and security of the LDS community over individual freedoms or moral considerations.

Consequences of Historical Actions

The actions taken by Young and the LDS Church during this period have had long-lasting effects on the community. The recent years have seen a significant number of members leaving the church, reflecting a growing dissatisfaction with the organization's practices and leadership. The rise of a more critical and informed public has exposed the historical lies and manipulations perpetuated by the church, leading to a broader movement of apostasy and disillusionment.

The recent political climate and media scrutiny have intensified the scrutiny of the LDS Church. Trump's actions and Smith's historical legal issues have served as examples of corrupt governance, leading some to believe that the massacre and other historical events were part of a larger pattern of abuse and manipulation. This has resulted in a societal backlash and diminished trust in the church's narratives.

Today, the LDS Church faces a challenging environment as its members question the authenticity of its history and the motives of its leaders. The church's propaganda machine continues to operate, but its effectiveness is increasingly questioned by a growing portion of its membership and the broader public.