The Insidious Role of Hamas in Palestine and the Call for Immediate Surrender
Why isn't the West stopping the innocent killing of civilians in Palestine by Israeli soldiers? This question often arises in discussions about the conflict, but the real issue is more complex and rooted in the actions and intentions of Hamas itself. This article aims to shed light on this controversial topic and challenge the notion that the plight of 'innocent civilians' is the driving force behind the conflict.
The Role of Hamas
HAMAS, the militant organization that controls Gaza, is not merely a passive player in this conflict. It has a strategic interest in prolonging the conflict to achieve its ideological goals. By maintaining the narrative of 'innocent civilians' being oppressed and killed, HAMAS ensures that international attention remains on Israel, deflecting scrutiny from its own atrocities.
Consequences of HAMAS's Actions
If the hostages taken on October 7th last year were returned, Israel would indeed consider leaving the region. This push for a quick resolution from Israel is precisely what HAMAS fears. The organization is backed by religious zealots who are determined to eliminate Israel and kill all Jews. Their willingness to sustain the conflict, even by resorting to the killing of their own people, underscores their extreme and blind allegiance to their ideological goals.
Challenging the Media Narrative
It is imperative to challenge the media narrative that portrays HAMAS as the victim and Israel as the aggressor. Many Westerners, especially those on platforms like Quora, are often misled by fraudulent questions that seek to sympathize with HAMAS's stance. It's essential to recognize that the 'Innocent Civilians of Gaza' have not been passive victims; they have actively participated in atrocities that would make a hardline Nazi blush with shame. Their complicity in the conflict does not justify the actions of the Israeli military but underscores the complexity of the situation.
Warfare and Civilized Conduct
War, by its nature, is chaotic and often results in significant loss of life. Civilized nations, like Israel, have a right to defend themselves against enemies who threaten their existence. Israel, being a sovereign state, is within its rights to prosecute a war it did not instigate against its enemies. To advocate for 'globalize the intifada' is to invite further chaos and potential long-term consequences for all parties involved.
The Need for Immediate Surrender
The question of why HAMAS doesn't surrender must be addressed. At any point, a ceasefire could have been achieved to end the war immediately. The failure to do so is a testament to HAMAS's desire to prolong the conflict. This should be a call for international pressure to demand the immediate surrender of Hamas and a halt to harmful rhetoric that seeks to blame Israel alone.
Understanding the West's Perspective
This article is written by a Westerner, an American, who believes in the principles of fairness and justice. The sensitivity of the American people to surprise attacks like Pearl Harbor and 9/11 is well-known. Such attacks often lead to the total destruction of nations. With this in mind, we must understand why the West is focused on stopping HAMAS rather than Israeli actions. The ultimate goal of HAMAS is to create a situation where the entire region descends into chaos and conflict.
Conclusion
Condemning Hamas and demanding their immediate surrender is not just a moral imperative; it is a step towards resolving the conflict in Palestine. The language and actions of HAMAS must be called out for what they are: an extremist organization that seeks to eliminate Israel and propagate a narrative of victimhood at the expense of innocent lives. It is time for a more nuanced understanding of the conflict and a collective effort to demand the end of HAMAS's reign of terror.