The Impact of Autopilot Systems on Pilot Skills and Reflexes

The Impact of Autopilot Systems on Pilot Skills and Reflexes

Recent airline accidents, such as Asiana Flight 214, have brought to light the potential downsides of relying too heavily on autopilot systems. While these systems undoubtedly bring convenience and safety, they might be subtly diminishing the natural skills and reflexes of pilots. This article explores the issue in depth, drawing from expert insights and real-world examples.

Over-Reliance on Technology: The Asiana Flight 214 Case Study

Asiana Flight 214, which tragically crashed into the runway in San Francisco, is a stark example of the dangers of over-reliance on autopilot systems. The pilots, though highly trained in using the autopilot, were unable to execute a simple visual approach when required. This incident highlights the importance of maintaining "hands-on" flying experience and the risks of complacency with technology.

The crash occurred in part due to a culture that discourages dissent. Lower-ranking crew members did not question the captain's decision, leading to a critical error that could not be corrected in time. This incident, while tragic, underscores the need for a balanced approach to modern aviation: proficiency in technology and in hands-on flying skills.

Practical Experience and Autopilot Usage

Many expert pilots, such as Ross, a CFI CFII MEI ATP SEL SES UAV PPC and USPPA Instructor, have opined that autobraking and autopilot systems should be used judiciously. Ross, drawing from his extensive experience, recommends that pilots use autopilot only when they have over 300 hours of experience and even then, it should be used to reduce fatigue on long flights.

He notes, 'I did not use it until I had over 300 hours experience and even then only to reduce fatigue on long flights.' This cautionary advice stresses the importance of maintaining manual flying skills, especially for long-haul pilots.

The Evolution of Piloting Skills: Modern Augmented Autopilot Systems

Modern augmented autopilot systems can sometimes be even more problematic. They often deprive the pilot of the "hands-on" flying experience, which is crucial for maintaining proficiency. Additionally, when a pilot response is needed, it is often just the minimum necessary, with the autopilot "filling in." This reduced level of engagement can lead to a decline in a pilot's overall flying abilities.

Reverting to Basic Airmanship Skills

The problem is exacerbated by the reliance on advanced technologies in initial training for younger pilots. The science fiction film Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace prophetically warned against the dangers of over-reliance on technology, especially with the character Luke Skywalker preferring manual controls even in hazardous situations.

From a practical standpoint, reverting to the basics can help preserve piloting skills. Training in taildraggers with steam gauges is suggested as a way to retrain pilots in fundamental airmanship skills. This approach can help mitigate the problem by ensuring that pilots have a solid foundation in manual flying techniques before they are introduced to advanced technologies like GPS autopilot FMS.

Conclusion

While autopilot systems bring significant benefits to aviation, there is a pressing need to balance technological reliance with hands-on flying skills. Pilots must maintain proficiency in both areas to ensure safety and efficiency in the cockpit. The lessons from the Asiana Flight 214 crash and the insights of experienced pilots like Ross highlight the importance of this balance.

Let us strive to keep airmanship skills alive, even as we embrace the advancements in autopilot technology. The safety of our skies depends on it.

Happy Landings!

Editor's Note: This article aims to provide a balanced perspective on the impact of autopilot systems on pilot skills and reflexes. If you have any further insights or questions, please feel free to reach out.