The Ideal and Reality of Full Communism
Communism, as a political and economic system, has long been a subject of debate and speculation. From Marx’s visions to the failed attempts of socialist states, the question of whether a country can achieve full communism has remained both fascinating and controversial. This article explores the feasibility of achieving full communism, examining the challenges, the nature of human beings, and the inherent struggles that arise when attempting to implement such a system.
Human Nature and Inequality
Communism, as a theory, aims to create a society without class distinctions and redistribute resources equally among its members. However, achieving such an ideal state is constantly challenged by the inherent inequalities among human beings. God, in many belief systems, creates congenital inequalities, which cannot be entirely resolved by redistributing material wealth.
Money and resources often reflect past achievements, status, or social standing. When these factors are removed and replaced with equal distribution, new forms of inequality may arise. For instance, differing levels of education, health, and social capital can lead to disparities that persist over time. Therefore, communism must address these underlying inequalities to avoid a recurrence of the same issues.
The Role of Human Ambition and Inevitability of Violation
Communist principles often conflict with human nature. People have varied ambitions, and their actions are driven by these desires. When faced with strict communist norms, individuals may find ways to violate these principles, leading to unintended consequences. For instance, the suppression of such behavior often results in a police state, which contradicts the very idea of a free and equal society.
The example of Stalin’s rule illustrates this point. After decades of attempting to suppress individual ambitions and desires, a leader like Stalin emerges to replace the religious or ideological framework. This shows that the rigid enforcement of communist ideals can result in the re-establishment of new forms of power and control.
Challenges of Implementing Full Communism
The inherent difficulties of implementing full communism are further highlighted by the impossibility of societies offsetting hereditary elements through environmental factors. Moreover, the nature of competition and the pursuit of ambition in humans make the creation of a truly communist society nearly impossible. States that attempt to enforce such norms often end up in a state of perpetual conflict between the ideals and the realities of human nature.
As Marx himself once said, people of the future would decide when they are free. This implies that true freedom and equality can only be achieved when individuals are empowered to make their own choices, not when they are forced to adhere to a preconceived idea of what is best for them.
Capitalism and Democratic Models: Successful Alternatives
Given the challenges in creating full communism, other models like capitalism and democracy stand as more practical alternatives. Capitalism addresses the lazy, greedy, and selfish aspects of human nature by encouraging hard work and individual contribution. When workers and owners are compensated based on their efforts and contributions, it incentivizes productivity and innovation.
Democracy, on the other hand, provides individuals with the freedom to make their own choices, which can lead to a more equitable and dynamic society. Both capitalism and democracy decentralize power, allowing for a more responsive and adaptive economic system that can adjust to the needs and desires of its citizens.
As we see today, every developed country that has achieved significant success follows a capitalist model with democratic principles. These systems allow for a balance between economic growth and individual freedom, which is crucial for maintaining social stability and progress.
In conclusion, while the idea of full communism remains an intriguing theoretical concept, the practical realities of human nature and societal complexity make its full implementation highly improbable. By embracing capitalism and democratic principles, societies can better address the complexities of human ambition and nature, leading to a more stable and prosperous future.