Introduction to the Great Doctor Who Debate: William Hartnell vs. Jon Pertwee
The timeless debate over who performed the iconic role of the Doctor better in the classic British sci-fi series, Doctor Who, dates back to the series' early days.
Two of the most beloved conductors of this debate are William Hartnell and Jon Pertwee, the first and third on-screen incarnations of the Doctor, respectively. Both actors brought unique qualities to the role, making the discussion an endless favorite among fans.
William Hartnell's Role in Doctor Who
William Hartnell, the first and original doctor, played the part of the 2nd incarnation of the Doctor. Hartnell's tenure began in 1963 and ended in 1966. His portrayal was often seen as focused, granular, and sometimes even grumpy, which added layers to the character, making him relatable to many viewers.
Hartnell was critical in defining the Doctor as a historian and a superior extraterrestrial. A key aspect of Hartnell's portrayal was his interactions with Susan, who served as a buffer between the Doctor and the humans. The casual,sometimes humorous, approach Hartnell took with Susan shows an understanding of the dilemma of a time traveler trying to connect with humanity. He laid the foundational traits for all subsequent incarnations of the Doctor.
Jon Pertwee's Contribution to Doctor Who
After Hartnell, Jon Pertwee took on the role in 1970, and his tenure lasted until 1974. Pertwee's contribution to the character is vast; he brought a new dynamic to the role with a mix of paternal affection, protection, and a gleeful engagement with the nonsense of time travel.
One of Pertwee's most significant changes was the portrayal of a Doctor who resonated with a younger audience. This period is often remembered for its pioneering moments, especially in the visual effects department. Pertwee's era also brought a greater focus on the Doctor as a protector, with the powerful and enigmatic Black Guardian being a central antagonist.
Personal Opinions: Hartnell or Pertwee?
Personal opinions on this debate remain fiercely divided, much like the audience of Doctor Who. Many enthusiasts argue that Hartnell's original interpretation of the Doctor was the most defining, while others prefer Pertwee's more maternal and whimsical portrayal. Some even struggle to understand the character as illustrated by Hartnell, describing his performances as overly grumpy and managing poorly with the child companion.
However, it is important to recognize that both actors played a crucial role in establishing and developing the character of the Doctor. They both contributed to the complexity of the character and to the cultural significance of the show. The original Hartnell was primarily a grumpy old man, whereas Pertwee brought a stronger paternal and kind element to the role, along with a gleeful enjoyment of the absurdities of time travel.
Conclusion and The Immortal Nature of Doctor Who
Ultimately, the question of which actor was better comes down to personal preference. Both William Hartnell and Jon Pertwee shaped the series into what it is today, each contributing unique qualities to the role of the Doctor. The show's enduring legacy lies in its ability to captivate audiences and inspire new generations of fans across the globe.
The eternal debate over Hartnell and Pertwee rages on, and the best part? There is room for everyone. Whether you side with the original grumpy old man or the beloved protector, the Doctor remains an iconic figure in the annals of science fiction.