The Democratic View on Political Disagreements and the Upholding of Fundamental Rights

Why Disagreeing with President Duterte is a Fundamental Right

When faced with opposition to President Duterte's actions, instead of resorting to retribution or harsh measures, it is essential to understand that every individual possesses the fundamental right to their own beliefs. I, for one, believe that it is rightful to express any disagreement with the president's actions, provided that such actions do not infringe upon the rights of others. As Voltaire once so eloquently expressed, 'I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.' This principle is at the heart of a democratic society.

Defending the Rights to Believe and Oppose

The ability to hold and express opposing views is a cornerstone of democracy. It is particularly relevant in the context of a government leader like President Duterte, whose policies may be met with both praise and criticism. While it is my belief that President Duterte’s actions are meant to benefit the Filipino people, it is crucial to acknowledge that each individual may interpret these actions differently. It is precisely this diversity of opinion that strengthens our democratic institutions.

For instance, it is entirely reasonable for supporters and detractors alike to question the president's motives and methods. Some may feel that the president's actions are brewed from a genuine desire to serve the people, while others may argue that any actions taken by a politically influenced leader are ultimately flawed and open to critique. This diversity of opinion is vital because it ensures the government remains accountable and responsive to the needs and wishes of the populace.

Why Political Support Must Go Beyond Adoration

The support for a political leader should never be based on blind worship or hero-worship. A true democratic society thrives on independent thought and evaluation. It is important to consider the president's actions and policies based on factual, unbiased, and logical analysis rather than personal affection. Politicians, being human, are subject to error, change, and the shifting winds of public opinion. It is the responsibility of the citizens to critically evaluate the actions of their leaders, rather than to blindly support them.

Moreover, a politician's good intentions, while commendable, do not insulate them from criticism. The public has the right to question and demand accountability from their leaders. This is not a sign of disloyalty or disapproval of the president's person, but rather a demonstration of the health of a democratic system. In a truly democratic society, it is the people who hold the ultimate power, and this is exemplified in the right to vote a leader out of office.

Engaging Constructively with Dissent

In the face of dissent, the appropriate response is not retribution but dialogue. If you disagree with President Duterte, voice your concerns constructively. Your disagreement may stem from a variety of factors, including but not limited to policy stances, personal beliefs, or concerns about the electoral process. Regardless of the reasons, it is important to engage in a respectful and informed dialogue. This constructive engagement not only strengthens the democratic process but also fosters a more informed and engaged citizenry.

Furthermore, if you feel that the electoral system is corrupt and that the majority of your fellow citizens do not support the president, history shows that peaceful protest and civil disobedience have been effective tools for change. The Philippines has a rich history of such movements, including the case of President Ferdinand Marcos. The key takeaway is that the voice of the people ultimately prevails, and it is this power that ensures the democratic process remains robust and just.

Ultimately, the duty of a responsible citizen is to remain vigilant, engaged, and informed. By doing so, we not only uphold the principles of democracy but also work towards a more unified and just society. Remember, it is the people who are the final arbiters of the fate of their leaders and the policies that govern their lives.