The Consequences of President Duterte's Absence in Our Country

What would happen in our country without President Duterte? This question often brings up visions of chaos, anarchy, and potential collapse. However, the true nature of such a scenario is more intricate than meets the eye. This article explores the potential ramifications of a sudden power vacuum with the current presidential term coming to an end and how the constitutional framework would dictate the situation.

Constitutional Transition: A Guided Path

Each presidential term culminates at a specific point, even for a re-elected president. The constitutional mandate stipulates that on January 20th following the November election, a new president or vice president must be sworn in. If, for any reason, no candidate has been elected or the electoral votes are not counted by this date, the Speaker of the House of Representatives becomes the acting president. This is a critical mechanism designed to maintain continuity and stability.

For instance, consider the case of former President Donald Trump. Even with his efforts to block the counting of electoral votes, this constitutional safeguard would have ensured a smooth transition, upholding the democratic process and preventing a prolonged power vacuum.

The Return of Colonial Rule?

Interestingly, the article also touches upon a hypothetical scenario where, should the United States fail to elect a president, the crown of the British monarchy would reassert control over the nation. This concept, rooted in the historical Prime Directive, highlights the significant power any president holds in determining national policy and stability.

HM Queen Elizabeth II, as the head of state, would appoint a governor general to govern in her name, effectively regressing the country to a colonial era. While this scenario is highly unlikely and purely theoretical, it underscores the importance of democratic governance.

The Current Setting and Its Challenges

Chaos has often been a byproduct of periods without leadership. Think about what a major blackout entails: chaos reigns, with looting, cars burning, and fights over essential resources. This scenario would be multiplied, with constant unrest across the nation.

Moreover, the article poses a rhetorical question that highlights the absurdity of the situation. Man is fundamentally a social creature, and the idea of a chaotic anarchy is more a result of human nature than a lack of government. In every conceivable scenario, someone would step in to lead, proving that the lack of a government would not simply result in a vacuum.

Impact on Society and Daily Life

The absence of a functioning government would lead to immediate catastrophic consequences. There would be a complete breakdown of social order as basic functions such as law enforcement, firefighting, road maintenance, and public utilities would cease to function. People would not have access to essential services and infrastructure, leading to a massive disruption in daily life.

For instance, consider the crucial roles of the police in maintaining law and order, the fire service in preventing and managing fires, the highway system in facilitating transportation, and public utilities in providing electricity, water, and other vital services. All these systems are interconnected, and their absence would cascade into a series of economic and social crises.

The Role of Corporate Entities in Governance

In the absence of a democratically elected government, the nation might fall under the control of large corporations. This scenario is particularly worrying as corporations, by nature, are primarily driven by profit and often lack the broader social and ethical responsibilities that a government must uphold. Corporate leaders may seek to implement policies that prioritize their interests, leading to an authoritarian form of governance without democratic oversight.

Furthermore, the idea of despotic rulers taking the reins is a realistic scenario. If the United States were to fall into chaos, the logical progression might lead to a leader like Putin or Kim Jong-Un, whose methods would likely be far from harmonious or in line with democratic values.

Concluding Thoughts: The Necessity of Government

The debate about the necessity of government in modern society is ongoing. While no political system is perfect, the absence of government would lead to a breakdown in essential services and societal order. Even critics of the current leadership recognize the indispensable role of a well-functioning government in maintaining public safety and order.

In conclusion, the question of whether our country would fare better without President Duterte is misguided. The structured transition of power, the potential for resurgence of colonial rule, and the inevitable chaos that would ensue in the absence of a government all underscore the critical role that leadership plays in maintaining the stability and prosperity of a nation.