Queen Elizabeth II’s Biological Father: Clearing the Confusion
The identity of Queen Elizabeth II's biological father is often a subject of debate, with varying claims and counter-claims. This article aims to provide clarity on the well-substantiated facts regarding the true biological father of Queen Elizabeth II and dispels myths surrounding the sterility of her family members.
Who was the True Biological Father of Queen Elizabeth II?
Queen Elizabeth II was the biological daughter of King George VI. The implication that Edward VIII, better known as the Duke of Windsor, could have been the father of Elizabeth II is often debated but remains inconclusive. Edward VIII abdicated the throne in 1936 to marry Wallis Simpson, and the records of his health and sterility are limited.
Five of the adult children of George V and Queen Mary are noteworthy. Edward VIII, the Duke of Windsor, was the only one who never had children, reflecting his lack of offspring. His sister, Princess Mary, and two of his brothers, George VI and Prince Henry, Duke of Gloucester, each had two children each, while his youngest brother, Prince George, Duke of Kent, had three.
False Claims and Mumps
Claims that Edward V (who was among the Princes in the Tower and lived in the late 15th century) was the true father of Queen Elizabeth II are baseless and disproven. Edward V, who was a direct descendant of King Edward III, never had any royal children, nor is there any genetic link to the Stuart lineage that eventually resulted in Queen Elizabeth II.
Additionally, it is often mistakenly suggested that King Edward VIII might have been sterile due to mumps. While mumps can sometimes cause sterility, no concrete evidence supports this claim for the Duke of Windsor. Moreover, the Duke of Windsor married Wallis Simpson when he was over 40 years old, and it is likely that she might have been sterile as well by that age, which would not have made it possible for him to father any children.
True Facts about King George VI
King George VI was the true father of Queen Elizabeth II and Princess Margaret. George VI was known to have fathered two daughters, clearly indicating that he was not sterile. His brother, Edward VIII, who renounced the throne in 1936, is more likely to have been the subject of sterility rumors. Edward VIII was thought to be infertile as a result of a mumps infection during his younger years, but there is no definitive proof to support these claims.
The surviving sons of George V and Queen Mary, including George VI, Prince Henry, Duke of Gloucester, and Prince George, Duke of Kent, all had children of their own, suggesting a healthy and fertile lineage.
Conclusion
The biography and descendants of Queen Elizabeth II's father, King George VI, provide a clear and well-documented lineage. The claims of sterility among the family members are often based on unfounded rumors and misconceptions. The evidence supports that George VI was indeed the true biological father of Queen Elizabeth II, and there is no substantive reason to doubt this assertion.
The confusion surrounding the biological father of Queen Elizabeth II stems from a mix of historical misinformation and baseless speculation. It is important to rely on verified historical records and evidence to form accurate conclusions.