Navigating the Future: Self-Sufficiency and Governance on Floating Cities

In the imaginary world of speculative fiction, the scenario of millions of people living on boats when land becomes unaffordable due to the accelerated melting of polar regions is often discussed. This narrative usually revolves around the challenges of governance, with the assumption that self-governance is necessary for the survival of these populations. However, these scenarios can be contested based on a variety of historical, social, and practical reasons.

Revisiting the Narrative of Governance on Floating Cities

One common argument posits that if people are living on boats, they do not need to be "governed." This perspective suggests that self-preservation and communal cooperation would be more crucial than formal governance. In reality, the idea of maintaining order without traditional governance structures is both highly idealistic and impractical. Historical examples of self-governance, such as some indigenous communal systems and modern-day communes, do provide insights into the feasibility of certain models, but the scale and complexity of floating cities would likely require more structured frameworks to ensure mutual support and prevent conflict.

The Reality of Sea Level Rise

Another key element of this narrative is the notion that sea levels are rising, submerging coastal cities. Contrary to popular belief, there is no empirical evidence to suggest that sea levels are significantly rising beyond natural, cyclical patterns. Various scientific studies have debunked the idea of a rapid and catastrophic inundation of coastal regions. Coastal cities have not disappeared as predicted, and there is no imminent threat of massive flooding as suggested in some apocalyptic narratives.

Survival and Alternative Solutions

If and when coastal flooding becomes an issue, the reality is likely to be more nuanced than mass migration to floating cities. People will face a multitude of challenges that may include relocation to higher ground, adaptation of infrastructure, and urban planning that addresses flood risks. The notion that humanity would suddenly shift en masse to living on boats while waiting for divine intervention for a solution is not grounded in practicality or historical precedent.

The Role of Self-Sufficiency

It is indeed the case that many people believe that self-sufficiency is not enough for survival, especially without the oversight of a government. However, the idea of a government "telling you what to do all the time" often misses the point of self-reliance. Many individuals and communities have already developed successful self-sustaining practices, such as farming, bartering, and community-based disaster response systems. These models show that individuals can take care of themselves and each other without relying solely on formal governance.

Moreover, the argument that proving the need for government assistance is a myth relies on the assumption that governments are infallible and that without them, humanity would face inevitable failure. In reality, many governments are already stretched thin and inefficient, and relying solely on them may not be the most practical or effective solution. Empowering individuals and communities to take control of their lives and environments is a more sustainable approach to resilience and adaptation.

Critical Analysis of Climate Change Discourse

The climate change debate is often fraught with both activism and misinformation. While the reality of climate change is well-established, it is also important to critically analyze the sources of information and the intentions behind various statements. Figures such as Al Gore have been vocal advocates for climate action, but it is also fair to question their motives and the coherence of their actions. Consistent with the global warming alarmism narrative, Gore has invested in land in coastal areas that are supposedly at risk of flooding. This raises questions about the reliability of predictions and the confidence in the rhetoric surrounding climate change.

It is crucial to balance the urgent need for action with a rational discourse based on sound science and evidence. While climate change is real, the solutions to this problem should be grounded in a realistic assessment of what is possible and feasible, rather than sensationalized predictions of an impending catastrophe.