NEST Entrance Examination: An In-depth Analysis of the 2018 Experience

The National Entrance Screening Test (NEST) is a competitive exam for entrance to NITs (National Institutes of Technology) and IITs (Indian Institutes of Technology) in India. This article analyzes the NEST entrance exam in 2018, focusing on the challenges and highlights of the General Section and individual subjects. The analysis is based on personal experiences and feedback from various test-takers.

Introduction to NEST 2018

On June 2, 2018, I took the NEST entrance exam, and it was a decisive moment for my future aspirations to enter one of the prestigious engineering institutes in India. With a strong performance in JEE Mains and options in WBJEE and COMEDK, my primary concern was JEE Advanced, which had an unfavorable numerical section. Despite these challenges, NEST turned out to be a refreshing experience for me. In this article, I will share my insights and experiences from the NEST 2018 exam.

General Section of NEST 2018

The General Section of the NEST 2018 exam was noteworthy for several reasons. The questions were diverse, engaging, and thought-provoking, catering to both logical reasoning and scientific curiosity. As a Physics and Chemistry (PCM) student, I found some questions challenging, but overall, the experience was enriching.

Contrasting Experiences: Easy vs. Tough Questions

It is interesting to note that the difficulty levels of the NEST 2018 exam varied among different shifts and types of test-takers. Some individuals reported an easy General Section, while others found it quite tough. My experience in the first shift was particularly challenging, as mentioned below:

Personal Experience in the First Shift

As a PCM student, I focused primarily on Physics and Chemistry, but even I found the General Section of the NEST 2018 exam demanding. A few questions that were particularly challenging include:

Discovery of X-rays and Electrons: The question about the discovery of X-rays before electrons from cathode rays was a curveball. This question required a deep understanding of the historical context of physics and scientific discoveries. Catalytic Converter: Questions regarding the gaseous waste converted in a catalytic converter tested my knowledge of automotive engineering and environmental science. Biology Questions: Even as a PCM student, I faced questions related to the intake and benefits of the first milk from the mother. This question highlighted the interdisciplinary nature of the exam and the importance of broad knowledge.

The General Section was designed to test not just subject-specific knowledge but also mental agility, reasoning, and curiosity. Many of the questions were based on real-life observations and applied scientific concepts, making the exam more than just a test of rote learning.

Specificity and Diversity in the General Section

The questions in the General Section were diverse, covering a wide range of topics. Here are some highlights:

Fire Crackers: A question related to fire crackers piqued my interest and challenged my understanding of chemical and environmental implications. Carbon Trading: A paragraph on carbon trading, which I had never encountered before, made me realize the importance of understanding global issues and policies related to environment and economy. Polygon Numbers: Questions on polygon numbers not only tested mathematical skills but also stimulated curiosity about number patterns and their applications. Biology and Logic Gates: A question linking logic gates to biological concepts bridged the gap between computer science and biology, showcasing the interdisciplinary nature of scientific knowledge.

Physics Section of NEST 2018

The Physics section of the NEST 2018 exam was primarily concept-based, focusing on fundamental principles and deep understanding. However, some questions required a more nuanced and critical approach, which made them more challenging:

Rotational Motion: One question related to rotational motion turned out to be incorrect, causing confusion among test-takers. This highlighted the importance of thorough preparation and verification of multiple-choice questions. Conceptual Depth: Apart from rotational motion, other questions required a deep understanding of physical phenomena, making the exam an excellent test of conceptual clarity.

Conclusion and Feedback

The NEST 2018 entrance exam showcased a well-rounded assessment of students' abilities covering a broad spectrum of knowledge and reasoning. While some students found the General Section easy, it presented a true challenge for others, highlighting the subjective nature of perceived difficulty. The Physics section, with a blend of conceptual and practical questions, tested both understanding and application. Feedback received from various test-takers indicates the need for the NEST conducting body to ensure consistency and fairness across different shifts and sections.

The NEST 2018 experience not only determined my academic path but also enhanced my problem-solving skills and broadened my horizons. It serves as a testament to the importance of a well-rounded education that goes beyond strictly technical knowledge.