Why Some Apostates Struggle to Move On From the Jehovah's Witnesses Cult
Leaving a religious organization such as the Jehovah's Witnesses often comes with its own set of challenges, especially when that organization has exerted a significant influence on one's life. This article explores why some former members find it challenging to completely let go of the teachings and the control that the organization once held over them.
Why the Watchtower Organization Persists in Holding Loved Ones Captive
The Watchtower organization, which is the administrative body of Jehovah's Witnesses, often retains a powerful hold on its members through strict doctrine and practices. One reason why apostates find it hard to move on is that the organization is still seen as holding some of their loved ones 'captive.' Many apostates emphasize that the organization's influence is not just personal but extends to family members and friends who remain active members.
Key scriptures support the idea that going beyond what is explicitly written can be problematic. For instance, many apostates argue that some of the organization's practices and doctrines are unwritten and not directly supported by the Bible. This creates a gap between what members believe is true and what can be substantiated through scripture.
The "Dog Returning to Vomit" Metaphor
Many apostates use the metaphor of a dog returning to its vomit to describe the phenomenon where former members may find themselves drawn back to the organization, even after they have left. This can be particularly relevant for those who have been active for a long time and return under pressure from family.
According to apostates, leaving the organization leads to a sudden clarity and realization about the false teachings they had followed. In their former state, they were too engrossed in the demands of the organization, such as the 'eight drunkards' (Governing Body), to notice the inconsistencies and manipulations.
Controlling Perceptions and the Culture of Manipulation
A significant aspect of why apostates struggle to move on is the organization's emphasis on controlling perceptions. This is exemplified in numerous incidents, such as the use of Henrietta M. Riley's name to invest in companies that are at odds with the organization's stated values.
The organization uses various tactics to maintain a hold over its members, even those who have left. For example, the concept of a 'plaque' with a statement in the round table room is mentioned, which apostates are asked to 'bloop' out of existence using their faith. This illustrates the ongoing effort to maintain a controlling environment both within and without the organization.
Conclusion
Leaving an organization as influential as the Jehovah's Witnesses is not a simple process. The influence of the organization extends beyond doctrine and practices, into the lives of loved ones and the broader community. The struggle faced by apostates is not merely a personal one but a battle against the control and manipulation exerted by the organization for decades.
Understanding the challenges faced by apostates helps to shed light on why they continue to grapple with leaving the organization. Addressing these issues can lead to a broader understanding of the effectiveness and nature of religious cults and their impact on individuals and communities.