Is the Perception of American Law Changing?

When the Department of Justice (DOJ) dispatches the FBI to search the residential summer home of a former President in pursuit of classified documents, while Hillary Clinton's handling of confidential and sensitive information on a private and unsecured server faced no ramifications, the question arises: have the laws in America become too strict or are they unfairly enforced?

A Double Standard in Law Enforcement

The perception of legal strictness in America often draws scorn. One might argue that the laws are either strict or they are not; it cannot be more strict than it is. However, the stark difference in how these laws are applied, particularly in cases involving political figures and social movements, suggests a more complex issue than mere strictness.

The DOJ's actions target a former President's personal property despite the fact that Clinton mismanaged government servers, which resulted in unchecked access and potential violation of classified information. Yet, BLM and Antifa, often identifying as progressive movements, have caused billions of dollars in property damage with no significant punitive measures. This double standard raises questions about the political filter through which law enforcement operates.

Double Standards and Political Influence

A better reformulation of the question is whether the Biden administration is adopting a more blatant double standard, particularly in law enforcement and prosecution. This suggests that political affiliations can heavily influence legal actions, creating a situation where the enforcement of laws is not uniform.

The issue extends beyond just strictness; it involves the arbitrary nature of law enforcement. The influence of political affiliations can make a significant impact on whether someone is pursued by the law or not. This is evident in scenarios where high-ranking politicians and those who support certain political agendas are subject to stricter enforcement, while others who engage in similar behavior face little to no consequences.

Laws as a Reflection of Society

Historically, the law in America has evolved, but its core principles remain the same. The law typically requires a victim or damaged property to establish a crime. There are often no specific laws targeting actions like those taken by BLM and Antifa, but the enforcement of these principles can be selectively applied.

One might argue that society is becoming more indulgent; however, in practice, the application of laws differs based on political and social factors. For instance, someone might be charged with a minor offense like stealing candy in some places, but the punishment can escalate drastically for political offenders. In this context, the law doesn't change, but its application certainly does.

Navigating the Legal System

When facing the law, a more practical approach is to understand that statutes and codes can be used to one's advantage. By challenging the legitimacy of any code or statute that is not in harmony with the law, you can create a strong position. This involves knowing that the law requires a clear victim or damaged property to establish a crime.

One effective technique is to challenge the authority of the state attorney. Their claims can often be undefined or vague. You can assert your rights by saying, "I am a man. Is there another man here today who claims I have done wrong?" If no one claims wrongdoing, you can assert that "this matter is over" and request that the case be discharged.

This approach, while simple, is rooted in the foundational principles of the American legal system. By questioning the legitimacy of the claims and using the law to your advantage, you can navigate the legal system more effectively.

Conclusion

The issue of whether American law has become too strict or is arbitrarily enforced is complex and multifaceted. It involves the perception of legal proceedings, the application of laws, and the role of political influence. Understanding and leveraging the principles of the legal system can provide a clearer path through the sometimes murky waters of justice in America.