Is it Offended if Thais Called Thai Siamese as Perut Hijau?
The term perut hijau is a term that carries significant historical weight, particularly in the context of the relationships between the people of Malaysia and Thailand. This article aims to explore the origin of perut hijau and whether it should be considered as an offense or not.
Historical Context and Origin
The term perut hijau gained notoriety during the Siam invasion of Kedah. This invasion occurred on November 18, 1821, and the conflict was known to the Malays of Kedah as Perang Musuh Bisik, meaning 'War of the Whispering Enemy.' The Siam invasion and the atrocities committed by Siamese soldiers towards the Kedah population, particularly the use of the green sak yant tattoo by Siamese troops, likely sparked this nickname.
The Green Sak Yant Tattoo
The green sak yant tattoo was a specific ritualistic tattoo used by Siamese soldiers during this invasion. It is significant to note that this tattoo was not used by other groups, making it uniquely associated with the soldiers of the Siamese invasion. The use of such a distinctive tattoo as a mark of identification could be why it became a lasting symbol in the memories of the Kedah population.
Some historians also believe sak yant tattoos were used to dehumanize or brutalize the local population. This could explain why the population associated the tattoo with the invading force's actions, attributing the term perut hijau to these barbaric practices.
Modern Interpretation and Perspectives
There are differing opinions on whether the term perut hijau should be considered as an insult. Some individuals, particularly those with a historical understanding of the Siam invasion, take the stance that the term is derived from the green sak yant tattoo and is not intended as an insult. They argue that it merely describes the distinctive mark left by the invading forces on the Siamese soldiers.
Others, however, might feel that the term carries a certain level of offense due to its association with the act of invasion and the brutal treatment and dehumanization of civilians. This sensitivity is understandable, given the trauma and loss experienced by both sides during this period.
It is important to note the perang musuh bisik connotes the contribution of the Kedah population in naming the conflict, making it a term with local significance. Thus, it may not be the same as a general term that might be universally applied or understood.
Conclusion and Reflection
In considering whether perut hijau should be described as an offense, it is crucial to weigh historical context against personal perceptions. While sak yant tattoos are not used today and the term itself does not actively call for hostility, the historical context and the impact this term had on those directly affected cannot be dismissed.
Understanding and respecting cultural and historical nuances becomes particularly important in global forums like the Internet. It is essential to approach such terms with a balanced and informed perspective, recognizing both the origins and current implications of language used.