Divine Accountability and Human Justice in Biblical Perspectives
In the intricate dialogue between humanity and divinity, the concept of divine accountability often presents a complex question. Drawing from Scriptures such as the Book of Habakkuk and Psalms, one can explore the depth of this inquiry within a divine framework where God is purported to be authoritative and just. This article delves into the multifaceted nature of these questions and provides insights that might bridge the gap between human and divine accountability.Is God Just?
The question of whether God is just when He does not hold Himself accountable has been a prevalent theme in religious discourse. In the face of widespread injustice in humanity, many ponder why God does not face the same scrutiny. This is exemplified in the cries of the prophet Habakkuk in Habakkuk 1:1-4, where the prophet voices his anguish over the seeming absence of divine intervention:“How long, O Lord, will I cry for help, and you will not hear? ‘Violence!’ I cry to you, and you do not save. Why do you make me see iniquity, and why do you merely look at wrong? Destruction and violence are before me; strife and contention arise.”
Habakkuk 1:2-3, NIV
Is There an Omnipotent Being in Reality?
Some argue that if such an omnipotent and omniscient being were to exist, it would be difficult for Him to align with human expectations of justice. The logic posits that if God can do anything, then His actions or inactions would be beyond human comprehension. Therefore, posulating such a divine entity leads to a Universe where nothing about the workings makes sense to human logic.The simplest explanation could be that such an omnipotent being does not exist, and the narratives and beliefs surrounding such a being are a way for humanity to find meaning in an otherwise chaotic world. This perspective suggests that the questions surrounding divine accountability may stem from a human need to ascribe meaning to an incomprehensible reality.
The Paradox of Divine Judgment
While the Bible indeed presents a concept of God as the ultimate judge, the irony lies in the fact that God does not hold Himself accountable, unlike human judges. This paradox is further emphasized in Romans 9:19-24, where God responds to the human question of divine accountability in a manner that challenges human perception of justice. The dialogue is encapsulated in the following verses:“Then you will say to me: ‘Why does he still find fault? For who is ever able to resist his will?’ But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? ‘Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, ‘Why did you make me like this?’ Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for everyday use?God's response here raises significant questions about the human propensity to judge divine actions, much like a potter has the right to shape clay as He pleases. God's will and power are seen as absolute, and hence, the apparatus of human justice is considered a simplistic lens through which to understand divine actions.
Romans 9:19-21, NIV