Did Russia or Joe Biden Really Blow Up Nord Stream 2?

In recent times, the theory that either Russia or the former President Joe Biden orchestrated the destruction of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline has gained significant traction. This article aims to debunk these claims and present a more factual perspective on the events surrounding the pipeline's destruction.

The Claim Revisited

First, it is important to note the timing and nature of the explosion. Both the Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 pipelines were damaged in September 2022. At the time, the United States was already at maximum capacity to deliver natural gas to Europe, making it highly unlikely that the U.S. would benefit from such an action. Furthermore, President Biden's energy policies did not result in reduced production. In fact, under his administration, the U.S. produced more natural gas than ever before in history and continued to export more petroleum and natural gas than ever before, raising questions about the alleged motive behind blow-ups.

Fact-Checking the Claims

One common narrative suggests that Joe Biden cut U.S. production of petroleum and natural gas, but this is a false claim. Since Biden took office, the U.S. has been exporting more natural gas and petroleum than ever before. Additionally, the U.S. has been producing more natural gas than ever, indicating a glut that negates any supposed economic advantage from pipeline destruction. The demand for natural gas did not decrease due to government action; rather, it stagnated in February 2022, likely due to the global economic impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Alternative Theories

Some suggest that President Biden, in his later years, might have acted recklessly, especially given the high profile of the incident and the criticism he faced regarding his decision to end the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. However, conspiracy theories such as this one fail to provide any credible evidence. Planting explosives under the Baltic Sea, rappelling down from a helicopter, and detonating them safely from the air are highly complex and unprecedented actions. There is no evidence to support such a scenario.

Closing Thoughts

The destruction of Nord Stream 2 was a complex and far-reaching event with significant geopolitical implications. While theories abound, it is essential to seek a balanced and evidence-based understanding of the events. The reality is that the U.S. had already maximized its natural gas delivery capacity to Europe, and there was no economic advantage to be gained from sabotaging these pipelines. Moreover, the claim of President Biden's reckless behavior lacks factual support and is more aligned with conspiracy theories than with facts.

It is crucial to rely on credible sources and evidence when formulating opinions on such critical issues, especially in the context of international relations and energy politics. By examining the facts and avoiding speculation, we can foster a more informed dialogue on these important matters.