Consequences of Absence as a PO During the COVID-19 Lockdown: Ethical and Practical Considerations

Consequences of Absence as a PO During the COVID-19 Lockdown: Ethical and Practical Considerations

The current pandemic poses numerous challenges for individuals in various professions, including those in banking. The situation experienced by POs (Public Officers), like you, highlights the complexities involved in maintaining operational continuity and adhering to regulations during a lockdown period. This article delves into the consequences of taking oral permission for leave and the ethical and practical considerations involved.

Understanding the Scenario

The situation described involves a Public Officer (PO) who took verbal permission from his/her manager to leave the headquarters during the COVID-19 lockdown. The manager has now requested the PO to return to work, which poses a challenge given the geographical distance. This article explores the potential repercussions and offers insights into ethical obligations and best practices.

Legal and Ethical Implications

Legal Perspective: As a PO, you are bound to adhere to specific regulations and rules set by your organization. One such rule is the necessity to report for duty as required. Without official written permission, your departure could be considered unauthorized and thus subject to disciplinary action. Consequently, your absence may result in:

Leave Deduction: Your manager may deduct the duration of your absence from your leave entitlement. If your leave is exhausted, the absence may be marked as a loss of pay. This could have a significant impact on your account, especially if you have limited or no alternative paid leave. Financial Impact: In cases where there is no available leave, the absence would be recorded as unpaid, potentially leading to financial strain if you do not have sufficient savings or other economic support.

Ethical Perspective: During a critical period like a lockdown, it is imperative to prioritize the welfare of the community and fulfill one's professional responsibilities. Public officers, such as bank staff, play a crucial role in ensuring the continuity of essential services. Absence, especially when it is not aligned with necessary and documented permissions, can compromise these services and put the community at risk.

Legal and Practical Steps to Take

Given the current situation, here are some practical steps you can take to address the issue:

Document Verbal Permission: If you have any documentation or records that confirm the verbal permission granted, gather them. This evidence can serve as a basis for any future disputes or negotiations. Collaborate with Management: Engage in open dialogue with your manager to clarify the current expectations and any potential remedial actions. It is important to ensure that both parties are aware of the rules and regulations applicable during the lockdown. Seek Administrative Support: If there is any confusion regarding the leave policy, seek clarification from the district administration or human resources department. They can provide guidance on whether travel permission is required and the necessary procedures. Consider Alternative Work Options: Investigate any remote working possibilities or other arrangements that could enable you to fulfill your duties without risking your health and the safety of the public.

Conclusion

While the situation you find yourself in is challenging, it is crucial to adhere to professional and ethical standards. Absence, even with verbal permission, can have significant legal and financial consequences. By taking the necessary steps outlined above, you can work towards resolving the issue and fulfilling your responsibilities effectively.

Remember that the current situation requires a balanced approach between personal circumstances and professional duties. By prioritizing ethical and legal considerations, you can navigate this period with integrity and responsibility.