An In-Depth Analysis of Resurrection in Avengers Endgame
Introduction: Dismiss the notion that the resurrection sequences in Avengers Endgame were an incomplete story element. Instead, we must consider the context of the Infinity Stones and their limited abilities.
Understanding the Thanos Snap and the Soul Stone
The fan theory regarding why the Avengers in Avengers: Endgame couldn't resurrect individuals who had died before the Snap invites meticulous examination. One must remember that when Thanos snapped his fingers, those who perished weren't eradicated; they were simply displaced, as evident from the visual representation known as dust. This magical entity, the Soul Stone, could only reclaim the souls it had extracted, not those taken by death itself. Boulder, the character who didn't participate in the Snap, has a crucial role here, as he symbolizes the limitations of the Soul Stone.
Reflecting on Banner's Efforts
Dr. Bruce Banner (a.k.a. Hulk) attempted to utilize the Soul Stone to bring Natasha Romanoff (Black Widow) back to life. However, the Infinity Stones presented a formidable barrier, not allowing Banner to carry out his wish. In-universe, this is due to the Stones' autonomous will. Banner's failed attempt echoes the limitations of the Infinity Stones, implying they can only rectify the direct harm they have caused. Thus, any resurrection capability would be restricted to those souls directly taken by the Snap.
Debunking Incorrect Theories
The myth that the Soul Stone siphoned away souls from the dead has been perpetuated since the release of Infinity War. This misconception must be dispelled. The Soul Stone cannot resurrect souls that have perished due to natural causes or traditional means of death like injury or illness. It only targets souls specifically snatched by Thanos' snap, as evidence by the visual effects post-resurrection.
Limitations of Omnipotence
The question arises: why stop there? Why not resurrect additional characters who died of natural causes prior to the Snap? Why not treat other global issues like curing cancer or eliminating evil? The introduction of such capabilities would lead to an overwhelming number of questions, fundamentally negating the purpose of the Snap and raising ethical concerns. This extensive power would necessitate an explanation for lacking omniscience, contradicting the already established narrative of Avenger's mission and limitations.
The Protector's Dilemma
In the context of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), Dr. Banner's inability to completely undo the Snap without incurring a personal cost is a deliberate narrative choice. It reflects the ethical and emotional toll of wielding such immense power. Even experienced heroes like Dr. Banner face real-world limitations, underscoring the themes of sacrifice and moral responsibility throughout the series.
For more detailed analyses of Avengers Endgame and other mainstream media content, stay tuned for future updates. Dive deeper into the intricate layers of storytelling and character development in these enlightening discussions.